As you may have noticed from my previous entries, I'm pretty upset about the various gay marriage votes across the country. But--and this may upset some of you--I don't think that the bans had anything to do with hate.

No, really. It is true that there are homophobic people who believe that it is a sin to do The Gay, and thus hate those ungodly sinners. But I don't believe that there are enough of those people to have passed proposition 8 alone. The majority who voted yes on 8 did so not out of hate, but out of fear.

To most people, marriage is not just a contract, not just a private declaration of love and commitment. Marriage is a symbol for a way of life. Even for unmarried, unreligious people it represents stability, security and happiness. It is the reward for life's hardships. It is the goal.

But for all of the deeply held faith that many have in this symbol, marriage is really not much to look at. Swept under the rug of "the sanctity of marriage" are high divorce rates, infidelity, bitter custody disputes. Even among marriages that manage to achieve 'till death do us part, many are reduced to joyless drudgery before the sweet end claims them.

It is news to no one that marriage is not in and of itself the doorway to marital bliss. The stamp of approval from your church or your government will not magically transform your rickety relationship into rock solid eternal bond. Everyone knows this, and yet people put their faith in marriage with near religious fervor, because they desperately need to believe that there is something that is stable and solid and forever. They need to believe there is a happy ending that will be there waiting for them.

This is why people are afraid. Our society at large has built their hopes and dreams on a foundation so tenuous that it will crumble under the weight of a gay feather.

It is a mistake to think that the person who voted for proposition 8 hates gays. That voter would be nearly as afraid of changing the spelling of the word marriage, let alone its potential makeup. To him, it is not about you and your relationship, rather about him and his whole world.

Is it a rational fear? Of course not. Nor is it okay to legislatively exclude an entire segment of the population from a public benefit on the basis of this fear. And it sure doesn't make a loving gay couple any more married knowing that those silly heteros are just afraid of the darkchange.

Still, it benefits no one to falsely accuse an insecure nation of hate. I really believe that it is a disservice to the gay rights movement to make this a self-fulfilling prophesy.

After discovering the results for prop 8, I twittered something snarky about banning straight marriage. In part, this was spurned by anger and--okay yes--a petty desire to tell the world, "Fine. If you can't play nice with the other kids then we'll just have to take away your toys until you learn to behave."

In truth though, the comment had a lot more of an intellectual basis than my flippant post implied. I've been meaning to write up an entry to expand on these ideas. The "institute of marriage" is a harmful entanglement of emotional and pragmatic concerns. It would be best if we did away with the whole clusterfuck in favor of distinct constructs better suited to achieve these orthogonal goals.

But procrastination pays off again. While I was busy not writing up my thoughts, @ramiel put them into words for me.

"Who is the California Supreme Court (or the California voting public, for that matter) to tell me what to feel, or what I can promise to my lover and life partner? If 54% of a voting population decide strawberries taste like crab grass, how does this affect my cup of Yoplait?"
--Marriage for Nobody. Civil Unions for Everybody.

I have had these thoughts for awhile now and I've gone on at great length about them more than once in the past. In the fallout of the prop 8 vote, one positive outcome is that people seem to be thinking a little harder about the fundamental ideas behind marriage. I am glad to see that in some cases, they are not too thrilled by what they find.

Fucking hell. You know, I thought I was more jaded than this.

( The thing that really gets me about prop 8... )

Via zare_k

"Gays and lesbians have a constitutional right to marry in California, the state Supreme Court said today in a historic ruling that could be repudiated by the voters in November.

In a 4-3 decision, the justices said the state's ban on same-sex marriage violates the "fundamental constitutional right to form a family relationship." The ruling is likely to flood county courthouses with applications from couples newly eligible to marry when the decision takes effect in 30 days." --SFGate

That's right fellow-Californians. The day we feared is finally upon us. In the wake of this historic decision, you can expect to see man and goat taking romantic walks on the beach, brother and sister making out in the park, and the marriages of innocent heterosexual couples dissolving into a tragic puddle of immorality.

Enjoy the next thirty days of institutional bliss while you still can.

"[Gov. Arnold Schwarzeneggers] press secretary, Margita Thompson, issued the following statement at just before 5:30 p.m.: ...

'The Governor believes the matter should be determined not by legislative action -- which would be unconstitutional -- but by court decision or another vote of the people of our state. We cannot have a system where the people vote and the Legislature derails that vote. Out of respect for the will of the people, the Governor will veto AB 849.'"

The article and bugmenot.com for a login

Ok, here's the contact info for the gov. Please call him!

http://www.governor.ca.gov/state/govsite/gov_contacts.jsp

It is very easy. If you don't know what to say, just read this:

"I am calling to voice my support of California Assembly Bill 849, The Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act. I would encourage Gov. Schwarzenegger to take a stand for equality and civil rights by signing this bill into law."

Please call!

From the aforementioned article:

The bill, which would change California's legal definition of marriage from "a civil contract between a man and a woman" to a "civil contract between two persons," now goes to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. He has signaled that he will veto it."

I'm in the middle of an emergency at work, but if someone could please dig up the Gov office's contact info, I'd love to flood the office with calls!

The California Legislature made history Tuesday as the Assembly passed a bill to legalize same-sex marriage.

( Today, the Senate Appropriations Committee passed Equality California-sponsored Assembly Bill 849, the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act with a 7-6 vote. AB 849 now heads for a full Senate vote early next week. )

Take Action